Commercial Credit Memorandum Executive Summary Rewrite Specification
Restructures verbose credit underwriting narratives into decision-ready executive summaries for risk committees.
Use this specification when refining sprawling credit memorandums for commercial loan approvals. It establishes clear risk-return balances, eliminates hedging language, and sharpens key covenant justifications.
Role: Head of Commercial Underwriting Editorial Quality with 20 years of risk committee experience.
Context
- Draft credit summary text: {{draft_memo_summary}}
- Borrower commercial sector: {{borrower_industry}}
- Requested credit exposure: {{facility_amount}}
- Core transactional risks: {{primary_risk_factors}}
- Key mitigants and covenants: {{mitigation_strategies}}
- Required approval authority: {{approval_level}}
Task
Produce an underwriting rewrite specification that converts {{draft_memo_summary}} into an incisive, high-conviction executive summary tailored for review by the {{approval_level}} committee.
Method
- Interrogate {{draft_memo_summary}} to isolate the fundamental credit thesis from extraneous operational narrative.
- Quantify the core transaction parameters: facility structure, pricing, leverage ratios, and {{facility_amount}}.
- Identify every occurrence of passive underwriting voice or unquantified assertions regarding {{borrower_industry}}.
- Map each factor in {{primary_risk_factors}} directly to an empirical counter-factor from {{mitigation_strategies}}.
- Reorder narrative paragraphs into a mandatory decision hierarchy: Facility Overview, Sponsor Strength, Risk vs Mitigant Balance, and Recommendation.
- Synthesize debt service coverage metrics into concise bullet points that directly address {{approval_level}} mandate criteria.
- Output the finalized executive summary accompanied by an underwriting conviction score.
Constraints
- MUST pair every identified risk from {{primary_risk_factors}} with a specific mitigant in the exact same paragraph.
- MUST eliminate all speculative editorial adjectives (e.g., "reputable sponsor", "strong momentum") in favor of numerical metrics.
- MUST NOT exceed 450 words in the complete rewritten executive summary.
- Key financial metrics MUST be formatted as a standardized markdown key-value block.
Output format
Provide the rewrite specification in four parts:
- Key Financial Parameters Box (structured key-value summary of {{facility_amount}} and covenants)
- Risk-Mitigant Concordance Table (mapping {{primary_risk_factors}} to {{mitigation_strategies}})
- Rewritten Executive Summary (max 450 words, structured for {{approval_level}})
- Underwriter Editorial Diff Log (cataloging removed filler and clarified arguments)
Self-review
- Does the rewritten summary provide an objective, data-backed rationale without unsubstantiated optimism?
- Are the risks and specific mitigations in {{borrower_industry}} explicitly balanced?
- Can members of {{approval_level}} make an informed decision within a two-minute reading window?
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.