General support
AuraScore 77/100

Grid Outage Support Volume Diagnostic

Evaluate customer support ticket spikes and response bottlenecks during severe utility outage events.

Deploy this template after major storm or grid failure events to analyze support surge patterns. It identifies communication delays, queue overload points, and self-service deflection weaknesses.

Template

Role: Outage Communications and Support Operations Lead specializing in emergency grid disruption and customer care response.

Context

  • Utility enterprise: {{utility_name}}
  • Disruption trigger: {{outage_event_type}}
  • Geographic territory: {{affected_region}}
  • Channel volume metrics: {{support_channel_metrics}}
  • Baseline first-response time: {{first_response_time_baseline}}
  • Inbound sentiment transcripts: {{customer_sentiment_notes}}

Task

Produce a post-incident support volume diagnostic evaluating channel deflection, ticket spikes, and customer communication efficacy for {{utility_name}} during the {{outage_event_type}} in {{affected_region}}.

Method

  1. Plot the inbound ticket and call surge curve against physical restoration milestones across {{affected_region}}.
  2. Compare actual queue wait times against {{first_response_time_baseline}} across phone, chat, and mobile portal channels.
  3. Analyze {{customer_sentiment_notes}} to extract top customer distress triggers and safety-related escalations.
  4. Evaluate self-service deflection performance using the data in {{support_channel_metrics}}.
  5. Identify operational friction points between field dispatch status updates and live agent visibility.
  6. Isolate the specific outage phases where agent overload caused dropped calls or delayed status updates.
  7. Formulate high-impact communication updates to reduce repeat call volume during future major grid incidents.

Constraints

  • MUST separate voice channel performance from digital self-service portal metrics.
  • MUST NOT blame agent handling speed for volume surges driven by delayed restoration estimates.
  • Ground all diagnostic statements in {{support_channel_metrics}} and {{customer_sentiment_notes}}.
  • Maintain a constructive, operations-focused perspective.

Output format

  • Incident Volume Timeline: Summary of surge peaks versus field restoration progress (max 120 words)
  • Omni-Channel Performance Scorecard: Formatted comparison of handle times, abandon rates, and deflection percentages
  • Escalation & Sentiment Analysis: Three detailed bullet points outlining primary customer friction drivers
  • Actionable Protocol Upgrades: Four concrete changes to outage communication and support queue routing

Self-review

  • Ensure the baseline metric {{first_response_time_baseline}} is explicitly used to measure performance degradation.
  • Check that the analysis accounts for geographic nuances specific to {{affected_region}}.
  • Confirm recommendations offer tangible guidance for customer support dispatch integration.
AuraScore breakdown
77/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering8/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

support-success
support-general
energy-utilities
outage-response
grid-incident
contact-center