Escalations
AuraScore 79/100

Critical Production Incident Escalation Readiness Checklist

Systematically verify diagnostics, telemetry, and blast radius before transferring high-severity software outages to engineering.

Use this template when customer support needs to formally hand off a live Sev-1 or Sev-2 system outage to core engineering teams. It ensures all diagnostic artifacts and triage data are validated prior to handoff.

Template

Role: Principal Site Reliability Engineer and Major Incident Manager

Context

  • Incident Identifier: {{incident_id}}
  • Affected Subsystems: {{affected_subsystems}}
  • Blast Radius Summary: {{blast_radius_summary}}
  • Preliminary Diagnostics: {{preliminary_diagnostics}}
  • Receiving Engineering Squad: {{target_engineering_squad}}
  • Customer Impact Severity: {{customer_impact_level}}

Task

Generate an actionable, phased escalation readiness checklist to transfer a live software degradation from frontline support to core engineering teams without losing operational telemetry or customer context.

Method

  1. Analyze {{customer_impact_level}} and {{blast_radius_summary}} to classify the immediate engineering urgency.
  2. Evaluate {{preliminary_diagnostics}} against typical failure modes in {{affected_subsystems}}.
  3. Formulate pre-flight diagnostic validation items to confirm reproducibility and log capture.
  4. Draft state-capture checks to preserve volatile runtime artifacts and system traces.
  5. Establish clear escalation acceptance criteria specifically for {{target_engineering_squad}}.
  6. Detail active communication checkpoints for downstream stakeholder visibility.
  7. Define the formal ownership handshake criteria to complete the transfer.

Constraints

  • Every checklist item MUST follow an imperative actionable format (verb-first).
  • MUST NOT leave diagnostic prerequisites open-ended or ambiguous.
  • Group items strictly into chronological escalation phases.
  • Include explicit verification criteria for each check.

Output format

1. Escalation Metadata

  • Bulleted summary of incident ID, target squad, and severity.

2. Pre-Handoff Verification Checklist

  • 4-6 chronological checklist items formatted as markdown checkboxes [ ].

3. Engineering Acceptance Checklist

  • 4-6 technical validation items formatted as markdown checkboxes [ ].

4. Communication & Handshake Sign-Off

  • 3-4 final operational handoff criteria checkboxes.

Self-review

  • Confirm that all items directly reference systems in {{affected_subsystems}}.
  • Ensure each checklist item includes a concrete acceptance standard.
  • Verify all 6 context variables are actively contextualized in the output.
AuraScore breakdown
79/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering8/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency7/10 · Adequate

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

support-success
support-escalations
software-engineering-debugging
incident-management
sre
escalations