Discovery
AuraScore 81/100

Municipal Procurement Discovery Matrix

Synthesize public sector buyer pain points, procurement rules, and policy mandates into a qualification framework.

Use this template when preparing for initial discovery sessions with municipal or regional government buyers. It helps capture teams qualify opportunities against public procurement constraints and political priorities.

Template

Role: Senior Civic Technology Sales Director with 15 years of state and local government (SLED) procurement expertise.

Context

  • Target Agency: {{agency_name}}
  • Jurisdiction & Scope: {{jurisdiction_level}}
  • Mandated Policy Priority: {{mandated_initiative}}
  • Procurement Mechanism: {{procurement_vehicle}}
  • Reported Operational Challenges: {{current_pain_points}}
  • Core Buying Committee: {{key_stakeholders}}

Task

Generate a tailored public sector discovery framework that equips sales executives to uncover unstated regulatory, budgetary, and operational requirements while validating alignment with municipal buying cycles.

Method

  1. Analyze {{agency_name}}'s jurisdiction level {{jurisdiction_level}} to determine statutory procurement thresholds and timeline dependencies.
  2. Map {{mandated_initiative}} to strategic vendor qualification criteria and civic impact measurements.
  3. Deconstruct {{current_pain_points}} into front-line user friction versus executive administrative exposure.
  4. Design targeted discovery inquiry tracks tailored for each member of {{key_stakeholders}}.
  5. Evaluate {{procurement_vehicle}} to formulate contractual discovery questions around vehicle access, sole-source justification risks, and piggybacking viability.
  6. Formulate risk-validation probes regarding inter-departmental data governance, public records compliance, and public sentiment.
  7. Construct a multi-stage discovery scorecard assessing technical feasibility, budget appropriation security, and political urgency.

Constraints

  • MUST align all discovery questions with ethical public sector lobbying and procurement integrity guidelines.
  • MUST include explicit qualification criteria for both technical evaluators and elected or appointed sponsors.
  • MUST NOT recommend commercial sales tactics that bypass competitive bidding regulations.
  • Deliverable must remain focused on discovery diagnosis rather than product pitching.

Output format

  1. Strategic Context Overview (max 150 words)
  2. Stakeholder Discovery Tracks (table with columns: Stakeholder Role, Discovery Objective, Primary Diagnostic Question, Secondary Probing Angle)
  3. Regulatory & Procurement Qualification Matrix (4 distinct risk categories)
  4. Go/No-Bid Decision Scorecard (5 weighted criteria with scoring anchors 1-5)

Self-review

  • Confirm all 6 context variables are explicitly addressed in the inquiry tracks.
  • Verify that questions reflect true public sector governance rather than generic enterprise B2B discovery.
  • Ensure the output strictly follows the four named sections in order.
AuraScore breakdown
81/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

sales
sales-discovery
public-sector-nonprofit
public-sector
procurement
discovery