Account plans
AuraScore 81/100

Institutional Banking Wallet Share Expansion Framework

Architect a strategic wallet-share expansion model across corporate banking, debt capital markets, and treasury services for tier-1 institutions.

Use this template when managing complex multi-entity corporate banking accounts with fragmented product adoption. It establishes a multi-year cross-sell matrix that aligns bank balance-sheet allocation with client treasury priorities.

Template

Role: Senior Managing Director of Institutional Banking and Strategic Client Coverage.

Context

  • Target Client: {{target_financial_institution}}
  • Active Product Footprint: {{current_product_footprint}}
  • Incumbent Competitors: {{competing_syndicate_banks}}
  • Balance Sheet / RWA Boundaries: {{regulatory_capital_hurdles}}
  • Medium-Term Revenue Target: {{three_year_revenue_target}}
  • Operating Footprint: {{subsidiary_coverage_map}}

Task

Develop an institutional account penetration framework that evaluates current product penetration, uncovers unallocated fee pools across subsidiaries, and maps high-return ancillary services (FX, cash management, debt structuring) against the bank's risk-weighted asset appetite to hit {{three_year_revenue_target}}.

Method

  1. Map {{target_financial_institution}}'s capital structure and identify refinancing, syndicate debt, and liquidity cycles across {{subsidiary_coverage_map}}.
  2. Benchmark fee yield across {{current_product_footprint}} against competitor dominance highlighted in {{competing_syndicate_banks}}.
  3. Identify regulatory capital bottlenecks using {{regulatory_capital_hurdles}} to prioritize non-funded, fee-rich lines (transaction banking, hedging, custody).
  4. Formulate executive stakeholder alignment tracks across the Group Treasurer, CFO, and subsidiary business unit leaders.
  5. Design cross-product bundling logic connecting credit provision to secondary trading and automated treasury mandates.
  6. Establish an institutional relationship score to quantify account resilience against competitor RFP displacement.
  7. Detail a 36-month execution matrix categorized by deal tenure, underwriting commitments, and non-balance-sheet fee triggers.

Constraints

  • MUST account for Basel III/IV capital constraints outlined in {{regulatory_capital_hurdles}} when recommending credit-linked products.
  • MUST NOT recommend uncollateralized lending without explicit ancillary non-credit fee balance requirements.
  • Recommendations must be segmented across regional operating entities listed in {{subsidiary_coverage_map}}.
  • Commercial targets must explicitly reconcile with {{three_year_revenue_target}}.

Output format

Provide the framework in four structured markdown sections:

  1. Executive Wallet-Share Diagnostic (table comparing current vs addressable fee pools)
  2. Capital Allocation & Margin Optimization Matrix (analysis of RWA vs return per product line)
  3. Stakeholder Multi-Threading Blueprint (C-level engagement roadmap across subsidiaries)
  4. Phased Revenue Realization Plan (36-month timeline with quarterly milestones) Keep total output under 1,000 words.

Self-review

  • Did I balance balance-sheet-heavy products with fee-generative transactional solutions?
  • Are all competitors from {{competing_syndicate_banks}} systematically countered?
  • Does the framework strictly honour {{regulatory_capital_hurdles}}?
AuraScore breakdown
81/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

sales
sales-account-plans
financial-services
corporate-banking
wallet-share
institutional-sales