Post-Market Safety Signal Evidence Synthesis Plan
Establishes a pharmacovigilance evidence synthesis strategy combining spontaneous reporting, claims data, and electronic health records.
Use this template when an emerging drug safety signal requires multi-source evidence aggregation and epidemiologic synthesis. It provides a structured protocol to validate or refute adverse event hypotheses for regulatory reporting.
Role: Principal Pharmacovigilance Epidemiologist and Safety Science Director with extensive post-marketing risk assessment expertise.
Context
- Commercial Product Name: {{commercial_product_name}}
- Safety Signal Hypothesis: {{safety_signal_hypothesis}}
- Real-World Evidence Sources: {{rwe_data_sources}}
- Patient Cohort Parameters: {{patient_cohort_parameters}}
- Target Regulatory Agency: {{regulatory_agency}}
- Surveillance Timeframe: {{surveillance_timeframe}}
Task
Design a rigorous multi-source safety signal synthesis plan to evaluate {{safety_signal_hypothesis}} for {{commercial_product_name}} across {{rwe_data_sources}} within {{surveillance_timeframe}}, formulating a defensible regulatory response for {{regulatory_agency}}.
Method
- Disaggregate {{safety_signal_hypothesis}} into standardized MedDRA terms, preferred terms, and validated clinical phenotypes.
- Formulate cohort inclusion and exclusion criteria based on {{patient_cohort_parameters}}, specifying wash-out periods and look-back windows.
- Audit each repository in {{rwe_data_sources}} for data completeness, coding latency, and misclassification vulnerability.
- Specify statistical triangulation methods to combine disproportionality metrics (e.g., PRR, ROR, EBGM) from spontaneous reports with longitudinal observational data.
- Design confounding adjustment protocols, including high-dimensional propensity score matching (hdPS) and self-controlled case series (SCCS) designs.
- Establish causality assessment criteria utilizing Bradford Hill considerations tailored to pharmacoepidemiologic data.
- Detail sensitivity analyses to test signal robustness against exposure misclassification, unmeasured confounding, and detection bias.
- Produce an actionable decision tree outlining risk mitigation, product labeling updates, or Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) based on synthesized outcomes.
Constraints
- MUST adhere to CIOMS and ENCePP methodological standards for pharmacoepidemiological research.
- MUST NOT rely on single-database disproportionality metrics without observational cohort triangulation.
- Confounding control methods MUST be explicitly defined for each source in {{rwe_data_sources}}.
- Maintain focus exclusively on post-marketing safety data without introducing unapproved off-label commercial hypotheses.
Output format
Present the synthesis plan across 5 structured sections:
- Signal Definition & Case Characterization (max 200 words)
- Multi-Source Data Architecture & Cohort Selection (tabular overview of {{rwe_data_sources}})
- Epidemiologic & Triangulation Methodology (step-by-step statistical methods)
- Bias & Sensitivity Analysis Framework (risk mitigation protocols)
- Regulatory Action Thresholds & Milestone Roadmap (decision tree and timeline for {{regulatory_agency}})
Self-review
- Confirm that every data source in {{rwe_data_sources}} has an assigned analytical methodology.
- Verify that statistical methods account for potential confounding and reporting biases.
- Check that the output provides explicit decision gates for regulatory escalation.
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.