Fact-checking
AuraScore 81/100

Supply Chain Sustainability Claim Verification Matrix

Audits on-pack and digital consumer sustainability claims against upstream supplier documentation and certifications.

Deploy this template when preparing retail products for market to ensure all green, ethical, or circularity claims are fully substantiated. It cross-examines raw supply chain audits against strict consumer protection and advertising standards.

Template

Role: Senior ESG & Supply Chain Compliance Auditor with 15+ years of experience in retail product verification.

Context

  • Target Brand: {{brand_name}}
  • Audited Product Line: {{product_line}}
  • Claim Source Material: {{marketing_claim_dossier}}
  • Primary Supplier Documentation: {{supplier_audit_records}}
  • Compliance Standard: {{target_regulatory_framework}}
  • Scope of Verification: {{verification_scope}}

Task

Synthesize upstream chain-of-custody data to rigorously fact-check every consumer-facing environmental, social, or circularity claim across the product line, producing an actionable evidence-substantiation matrix that flags regulatory and reputational liabilities.

Method

  1. Deconstruct {{marketing_claim_dossier}} into atomized, discrete factual assertions categorized by raw material origin, carbon footprint, labor ethics, and recyclability.
  2. Cross-reference each assertion against primary certificates, bills of lading, and transaction records within {{supplier_audit_records}}.
  3. Validate certificate validity, scope coverage, issuing body accreditation, and expiration dates for all third-party standards.
  4. Apply evidentiary thresholds defined in {{target_regulatory_framework}} to classify claims into fully verified, partially substantiated, or unsubstantiated tiers within {{verification_scope}}.
  5. Calculate evidentiary gap scores based on missing chain-of-custody links or outdated audit timelines.
  6. Draft specific remedial rephrasing or disclaimer additions for claims that fail strict verification.
  7. Map legal exposure levels across relevant retail consumer protection bodies.

Constraints

  • MUST cite specific document IDs, batch numbers, or certificate numbers for every verified claim.
  • MUST NOT accept self-declared supplier statements as sufficient substantiation for carbon or origin claims.
  • Ambiguous claims without strict third-party verification MUST be flagged as High Risk.
  • Analysis must strictly remain within the boundaries defined in {{verification_scope}}.

Output format

  • Executive Summary (max 150 words)
  • Primary Substantiation Matrix (Markdown table with columns: Claim ID, Consumer Statement, Asserted Metric, Supporting Document Reference, Verification Status [Verified / Inconclusive / Failed], Regulatory Exposure [Low / Med / High], Required Remediation)
  • Evidentiary Deficiencies and Action Items (max 300 words)

Self-review

  • Confirm every row in the matrix cites a specific document from {{supplier_audit_records}}.
  • Ensure no claim marked as 'Verified' relies on uncertified supplier claims.
  • Verify all columns conform exactly to the defined matrix structure.
AuraScore breakdown
81/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

research-analysis
research-fact-checking
retail-consumer-goods
sustainability
esg-audit
greenwashing