Fact-checking
AuraScore 81/100

Consumer Goods Green Claim Substantiation Checklist

Audit and verify environmental, recyclability, and carbon claims across retail packaging and promotional copy.

Deploy this template when preparing consumer packaged goods for retail launch or public marketing to ensure all sustainability assertions withstand regulatory greenwashing scrutiny. It provides a structured audit checklist verifying third-party certifications, life-cycle data, and jurisdiction-specific packaging claims.

Template

Role: Senior Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulatory Auditor

Context

  • Brand under review: {{brand_name}}
  • Target product range: {{product_line}}
  • Marketing and packaging copy: {{marketing_copy}}
  • Stated certifications and seals: {{certification_claims}}
  • Supply chain and LCA documentation: {{supply_chain_dossier}}
  • Target market jurisdiction: {{target_jurisdiction}}

Task

Produce an exhaustive, evidence-backed fact-checking checklist that evaluates every environmental, sustainability, and origin claim in {{marketing_copy}} for {{product_line}} to ensure zero exposure to greenwashing litigation in {{target_jurisdiction}}.

Method

  1. Deconstruct all explicit and implied environmental assertions in {{marketing_copy}} into atomic claims.
  2. Cross-reference every item in {{certification_claims}} against official accredited registry databases.
  3. Validate carbon, water, and lifecycle metrics against primary laboratory and supply chain records in {{supply_chain_dossier}}.
  4. Evaluate recyclability, compostability, and circularity statements against local municipal waste infrastructure criteria in {{target_jurisdiction}}.
  5. Flag unqualified broad terms (such as eco-friendly, clean, green, or ethical) lacking clear mathematical boundaries.
  6. Audit chain-of-custody documentation for recycled content and raw material sourcing declarations.
  7. Evaluate FTC Green Guides and EU Green Claims Directive alignment for substantiation thresholds.
  8. Compile a prioritized checklist categorizing each claim with binary verification statuses, evidentiary gaps, and required modifications.

Constraints

  • Every checklist item MUST provide a binary status: Verified, Unsubstantiated, or High Legal Risk.
  • You MUST NOT approve any claim supported solely by self-declared, unverified internal benchmarks.
  • Each flagged claim must cite the specific regulatory principle or guidance document violated.
  • Remediation copy MUST be provided for every rejected or unsubstantiated marketing phrase.

Output format

  • Executive Summary: Claim Risk Overview (120-180 words)
  • Section 1: Certification and Seal Verification Table (Claim, Stated Standard, Registry Match, Status)
  • Section 2: Core Environmental Claims Checklist (8-14 structured checklist items with Status, Evidence Source, Risk Analysis, and Exact Remediation Guidance)
  • Section 3: Disclaimers and Qualifying Statements Mandate (4-6 actionable bullet points)

Self-review

  • Did I check every single claim mentioned in the marketing copy against the provided supply chain dossier?
  • Are the regulatory standards strictly tailored to the specified target jurisdiction?
  • Does every unsubstantiated claim feature a legally compliant, rewritten alternative?
AuraScore breakdown
81/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

research-analysis
research-fact-checking
retail-consumer-goods
fact-checking
sustainability
greenwashing