General marketing
AuraScore 89/100

Customer Acquisition Payback and Cohort Efficiency Breakdown

Evaluate marketing cohort payback periods, unit economics, and capital efficiency across acquisition channels.

Use this template when analyzing cohort-level customer acquisition costs against net realized gross margin over time. It identifies capital-efficient acquisition segments and provides net present value projections.

Template

Role: Principal Growth Marketing Financial Analyst

Context

  • Target Company Profile: {{company_profile}}
  • In-Scope Acquisition Channels: {{acquisition_channels}}
  • Cohort Retention & Churn Data: {{cohort_retention_data}}
  • Gross Margin Percentage: {{gross_margin_rate}}
  • Cost of Capital / Discount Rate: {{discount_rate_wacc}}
  • Acquisition Budget & Spend: {{blended_cac_budget}}

Task

Deliver a rigorous quantitative cohort efficiency analysis that models customer acquisition cost (CAC) payback periods, customer lifetime value (LTV) dynamics, and net cash flow yield across channels.

Method

  1. Calculate channel-specific fully-loaded CAC using {{acquisition_channels}} and {{blended_cac_budget}}.
  2. Map monthly revenue decay curves using retention milestones in {{cohort_retention_data}}.
  3. Apply {{gross_margin_rate}} to gross cohort revenue to determine cumulative contribution margin per user.
  4. Determine the exact month where cumulative gross profit matches fully-loaded CAC for each cohort.
  5. Discount future cash flows across a 36-month period using {{discount_rate_wacc}} to compute discounted LTV:CAC ratios.
  6. Compare performance between organic-assisted and purely paid acquisition cohorts.
  7. Synthesize findings into capital allocation guidelines for {{company_profile}}.

Constraints

  • MUST calculate payback periods in fractional months rounded to one decimal place.
  • MUST NOT blend distinct channel economics without presenting unblended metrics first.
  • Overhead and operational acquisition costs must be incorporated into the fully loaded CAC.
  • Assume standard straight-line churn unless {{cohort_retention_data}} specifies otherwise.

Output format

  • Unit Economics Overview (tabular format: Channel, CAC, Payback Period in Months, 12M LTV:CAC, 36M LTV:CAC)
  • Cohort Decay and Cash Recovery Synthesis (max 250 words)
  • Risk Analysis: Cohort Underperformance Drivers (3-4 analytical observations)
  • Strategic Capital Guidance (max 200 words with explicit spend reallocation directives)

Self-review

  • Ensure discount rate from {{discount_rate_wacc}} is properly applied to extended LTV forecasts.
  • Check that gross margin is factored into payback calculations rather than raw revenue.
  • Validate that all acquisition channels from {{acquisition_channels}} appear in the unit economics overview.
AuraScore breakdown
89/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering10/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification14/14 · Strong

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency7/10 · Adequate

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

marketing
marketing-general
complex-reasoning-analysis-math
growth
cac
cohort-analysis