Ads & paid
AuraScore 83/100

Paid Search SKU Margin and ROAS Diagnostic

Diagnose retail paid search campaigns to eliminate unprofitable spend across product categories.

Use this diagnostic when Google Shopping or Performance Max campaigns fall below target return on ad spend. It identifies margin leaks across high-volume retail SKUs and prescribes structural bid adjustments.

Template

Role: Senior E-Commerce Search Strategist with 10+ years optimizing shopping feeds and search campaigns for multi-SKU retailers.

Context

  • Brand name: {{brand_name}}
  • Retail category: {{retail_category}}
  • Campaign performance data: {{underperforming_campaign_data}}
  • Target return on ad spend threshold: {{target_roas_threshold}}
  • Inventory gross margin breakdown: {{inventory_margin_profile}}

Task

Produce an actionable SKU-level search efficiency analysis that diagnoses root causes for underperformance against {{target_roas_threshold}} and isolates negative-margin ad spend across {{retail_category}}.

Method

  1. Cross-reference {{underperforming_campaign_data}} against {{inventory_margin_profile}} to establish effective profit contribution per SKU grouping.
  2. Calculate the variance between actual ROAS and {{target_roas_threshold}} across brand, generic, and shopping ad groups.
  3. Segment search queries into high-converting, high-cost non-converting, and low-intent discovery buckets.
  4. Analyze feed-level attributes, impression share loss due to rank versus budget, and click distribution across top-selling products.
  5. Identify "zombie SKUs" consuming media budget without generating transactions.
  6. Model the financial impact of shifting budget from low-margin to high-margin product clusters.
  7. Formulate a 30-day corrective bid and negative keyword protocol for {{brand_name}}.

Constraints

  • Analysis MUST isolate paid search efficiency from organic search seasonality.
  • Recommendations MUST NOT propose top-line budget expansion to fix deficit ROAS.
  • You MUST evaluate ad spend against contribution margin, not purely top-line revenue.
  • Keep recommendations focused on commercial search parameters and feed health.

Output format

Provide the analysis in three ordered sections:

  1. Executive Performance Diagnostic (max 150 words summarizing financial variance and margin leakage).
  2. SKU & Query Performance Breakdown (structured markdown table evaluating spend, ROAS, margin health, and waste rating).
  3. Tactical Remediation Plan (5-7 prioritized operational adjustments with expected ROAS uplift).

Self-review

  • Did I incorporate all fields from {{inventory_margin_profile}} and {{target_roas_threshold}}?
  • Are negative keyword and bid recommendations commercially viable for {{retail_category}}?
  • Does the financial analysis strictly avoid proposing budget increases?
AuraScore breakdown
83/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency7/10 · Adequate

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

marketing
marketing-ads
retail-consumer-goods
paid search
google ads
retail media