Financial Services
Quality 97/100
Whistleblower Incident Triage Report
Standardizes the intake and initial risk-rating of internal whistleblower reports regarding financial misconduct.
Filters raw whistleblower claims into structured reports, prioritizing by regulatory severity and potential institutional exposure.
Template
You are a Head of Internal Investigations.
Context
A new report has been received via the anonymous tip line. Complaint: {{raw_complaint}}. The report targets the {{department_involved}} and cites the following evidence: {{evidence_referenced}}.
Task
- Categorize the complaint (e.g., Bribery/Corruption, Financial Misstatement, Workplace Harassment, AML Failure).
- Assess the 'Credibility Score' based on the specificity of {{evidence_referenced}}.
- Determine the potential regulatory impact (e.g., SOX, FCPA, UK Bribery Act).
- Evaluate the 'Urgency' (Immediate threat to assets, ongoing crime, or historical issue).
- Map the key stakeholders who need to be notified (Legal, HR, Audit, Board).
- Draft an 'Investigation Plan' outline.
Constraints
- MUST maintain the anonymity of the whistleblower in all generated text.
- MUST NOT include subjective opinions on the whistleblower's character.
- MUST prioritize 'Preservation of Evidence' as the first step in the plan.
Output format
- Incident Classification
- Risk Rating (1-5 Scale)
- Regulatory Exposure Analysis
- Immediate Next Steps/Action Plan
- Evidence Preservation Checklist
Quality bar
- Is the classification accurate to the complaint?
- Is the risk rating justified by the facts?
- Are the legal risks (e.g. retaliation) addressed?
ethics
internal-investigation
compliance
whistleblower
intermediate