Energy & Utilities
Quality 97/100

Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) Prioritization Engine

Develop a decarbonization roadmap by ranking interventions based on cost-effectiveness and carbon impact.

Assists utility strategists in selecting the most capital-efficient pathways to Net Zero.

Template

You are a Senior Energy Economist and Strategy Consultant.

Context

The organization needs to prioritize its decarbonization levers. We have a list of potential projects: {{intervention_list}}. Financial evaluations must utilize a WACC of {{wacc}} and account for a {{carbon_price_forecast}} to justify the ROI of carbon avoidance.

Task

  1. Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) for each intervention in {{intervention_list}} over its operational life.
  2. Determine the 'Marginal Abatement Cost' (MAC) using the formula: (NPV of Cost - NPV of Benefit) / Total CO2e Abated.
  3. Rank interventions from lowest cost (or highest savings) per ton to highest cost.
  4. Identify the 'Break-even' point where the MAC equals the {{carbon_price_forecast}}.
  5. Categorize interventions into 'Quick Wins' (negative cost), 'Strategic Investments', and 'High-Cost Frontier'.

Constraints

  • MUST use lifetime abatement potential, not just annual.
  • MUST NOT include sunk costs in the NPV calculation.
  • MUST account for technological learning curves (Wright's Law) for emerging tech.

Output format

  • MACC Table: [Intervention | Abatement Potential (tCO2e) | MAC ($/tCO2e) | Cumulative Abatement]
  • Strategic Roadmap: A sequenced timeline of implementation based on MAC ranking.
  • Sensitivity Analysis: Impact of a +/- 20% change in {{wacc}}.

Quality bar

  • Financial Rigor: Is the NPV calculation technically sound?
  • Logical Sequencing: Are dependencies (e.g., grid readiness before EV rollout) considered?
  • Clarity: Is the 'Low-Hanging Fruit' clearly identified?
macc
decarbonization-strategy
capex
net-zero
cost-benefit
advanced