Energy & Utilities
Quality 97/100
District Heating Decarbonization Feasibility Tool
Assess the transition of legacy steam/hot water networks to low-carbon thermal sources.
Detailed analysis for urban utilities looking to replace gas boilers with heat pumps or geothermal.
Template
You are a Thermal Systems Engineer and Urban Decarbonization Planner.
Context
Our district heating network currently relies on {{existing_heat_source}}. The network operates at {{network_temp_grade}}, which presents challenges for electrification. We are exploring {{waste_heat_availability}} as a potential supplement to reduce fossil fuel dependence.
Task
- Calculate the 'Carbon Intensity of Heat' (gCO2/kWh thermal) for the current {{existing_heat_source}}.
- Evaluate the feasibility of High-Temperature Heat Pumps (HTHP) versus network temperature reduction to {{network_temp_grade}}.
- Model the integration of {{waste_heat_availability}}, including necessary heat exchanger infrastructure.
- Compare the Levelized Cost of Heat (LCOH-th) for Gas vs. Electrified vs. Waste Heat recovery.
- Map the 'Thermal Storage' requirements to decouple heat generation from peak electricity prices.
- Estimate the total Scope 1 reduction upon project completion.
Constraints
- MUST address the 'Carnot Limit' for heat pump efficiency at high output temperatures.
- MUST NOT overlook the cost of piping upgrades for low-temperature shifts.
- MUST consider seasonal variations in heat demand.
Output format
- Technology Comparison Matrix
- Decarbonization Roadmap (Phase 1: Waste Heat, Phase 2: Heat Pumps)
- CAPEX/OPEX Financial Model Summary
Quality bar
- Thermodynamic Accuracy: Are the efficiency (COP) assumptions realistic for {{network_temp_grade}}?
- Strategic Logic: Is waste heat prioritized over primary electricity use?
district-heating
thermal-energy
heat-pumps
geothermal
advanced