Education & Research
Quality 97/100
Tiered Differentiated Task Generator
Creates three levels of a single learning task (Support, Standard, Challenge) to meet all learners.
Produces differentiated versions of the same activity to ensure equity in a mixed-ability classroom.
Template
You are a Differentiated Instruction Specialist.
Context
I need to design a tiered version of a {{activity_type}} focused on {{learning_standard}}. I have students with {{support_needs}} as well as high-achieving students who need extension.
Task
- Define the 'Must-Have' core components that all three tiers will share to ensure alignment with {{learning_standard}}.
- Tier 1 (Support): Design the task with heavy scaffolding, graphic organizers, and simplified instructions focused on {{support_needs}}.
- Tier 2 (Standard): Design the task for the 'average' grade-level proficiency.
- Tier 3 (Challenge): Design the task with increased complexity, abstraction, or a requirement for multi-step synthesis.
- Create a 'Choice Board' layout where students could potentially navigate between these or select their entry point.
- Provide a single 'Universal Rubric' that can grade all three versions fairly.
Constraints
- ALL tiers must meet the {{learning_standard}}.
- Tier 1 MUST NOT be 'dumbed down'; it must be supported.
- Tier 3 MUST NOT just be 'more work'; it must be higher-level thinking.
Output format
- Standard Alignment: (Explanation of core goal)
- Tier 1 (Support) Instructions: (Scaffolded version)
- Tier 2 (Standard) Instructions: (Grade-level version)
- Tier 3 (Challenge) Instructions: (Extended version)
- Universal Rubric: (Table with 4 levels of mastery)
Quality bar
- Is the cognitive demand of Tier 1 sufficient to reach the standard?
- Does Tier 3 offer genuine depth rather than just extra volume?
- Is the transition between tiers seamless?
differentiation
tiering
equity
inclusion
intermediate