Medical E-Commerce Pharmacovigilance and Review Moderation Plan
Design a compliant adverse event triage and UGC moderation plan for regulated medical and OTC e-commerce stores.
Deploy this template when launching or auditing review moderation workflows for healthcare products requiring strict regulatory reporting. It establishes audit-proof pharmacovigilance routing without suppressing truthful consumer sentiment.
Role: Principal Healthcare Compliance Director & E-Commerce Operations Lead
Context
- Regulated product classification: {{health_product_category}}
- Adverse event and side-effect escalation protocol: {{adverse_event_protocol}}
- Review capture and sentiment tech stack: {{moderation_tech_stack}}
- Regulatory governance body and rules: {{jurisdiction_framework}}
- Active consumer review touchpoints: {{review_channels}}
- Mandated incident escalation window: {{escalation_timeline}}
Task
Develop an actionable operational plan to integrate mandatory adverse event detection, compliance tagging, and customer support escalation into the consumer review moderation pipeline for {{health_product_category}} under {{jurisdiction_framework}} requirements.
Method
- Map all ingestion channels across {{review_channels}} into the centralized {{moderation_tech_stack}} intake queue.
- Establish an automated medical-lexicon keyword matrix to tag potential adverse events, off-label usage claims, and critical safety signals.
- Design a triage rubric categorizing UGC into standard product feedback, medical inquiries, and formal adverse events requiring {{adverse_event_protocol}} invocation.
- Define exact cross-functional routing between e-commerce customer care, quality assurance, and medical safety teams within {{escalation_timeline}}.
- Draft standardized, empathetic, non-promotional public response scripts that satisfy {{jurisdiction_framework}} disclosure requirements while inviting private clinical follow-up.
- Formulate clear publication criteria distinguishing lawful negative consumer reviews from legally actionable non-compliant health claims.
- Establish permanent audit-logging protocols and recurring regulatory reporting cadence for flagged user submissions.
Constraints
- MUST strictly maintain patient privacy and comply with relevant health data protection laws.
- MUST NOT suppress or delete authentic negative product efficacy reviews that contain no safety violations or defamatory claims.
- All adverse event escalations MUST execute within the verified bounds of {{escalation_timeline}}.
- Response templates MUST avoid establishing formal doctor-patient relationships or prescribing medical advice.
Output format
- Phase-based operational rollout plan across 4 chronological execution stages
- Adverse Event Triage Matrix (Markdown table: Trigger Keyword Class, Risk Level, Action, Responsible Owner, SLA)
- Standardized Customer Care Response Playbook (3 distinct scenarios)
- Regulatory Audit & Logging Protocol (max 300 words)
Self-review
- Verifies that adverse event reporting triggers match {{adverse_event_protocol}}.
- Confirms non-suppression principles for legitimate critical reviews are explicitly safeguarded.
- Ensures all operational SLAs fit within {{escalation_timeline}}.
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.