Promotions
AuraScore 81/100

Enterprise Software Marketplace Partner Co-Marketing Promotional Report

Assess co-funded marketplace promotion outcomes to quantify ecosystem expansion, partner ROI, and customer quality.

Use this template to audit co-funded software marketplace promotions run jointly with ISVs or technology partners. It produces an executive evaluation covering partner co-op fund efficiency, enterprise adoption quality, and partner network expansion.

Template

Role: Senior Ecosystem Commercialization Strategist with expertise in B2B software marketplaces and partner channel sales.

Context

  • Marketplace Host: {{marketplace_platform}}
  • Partner Category: {{vendor_category}}
  • Credit Incentive: {{promotional_credit_amount}}
  • Fund Split Ratio: {{co_funded_split_ratio}}
  • Target Market: {{pilot_customer_segment}}
  • Target Acquisition Cost: {{customer_acquisition_cost_limit}}

Task

Produce an ecosystem promotional performance report evaluating the collaborative incentive campaign on {{marketplace_platform}} for {{vendor_category}}, auditing pipeline velocity, co-funding efficiency, and buyer qualification rates.

Method

  1. Review the redemption velocity of {{promotional_credit_amount}} across target enterprise accounts in {{pilot_customer_segment}}.
  2. Analyze the capital efficiency of the co-funding model based on the agreed {{co_funded_split_ratio}}.
  3. Benchmark overall customer acquisition costs against the strict ceiling of {{customer_acquisition_cost_limit}}.
  4. Measure multi-product attach rates among buyers who entered through this joint promotion.
  5. Evaluate third-party vendor participation sentiment and operational friction during the promotion.
  6. Quantify buyer quality by tracking 60-day post-redemption software activation and seat provisioning rates.
  7. Construct an optimization matrix for future co-marketing expenditure across the broader ecosystem.

Constraints

  • MUST evaluate partner ROI separately from overall platform marketplace revenue.
  • MUST NOT consider unverified platform impressions as successful acquisition metrics.
  • All cost metrics must factor in the credit liability of {{promotional_credit_amount}}.
  • Report must focus strictly on B2B enterprise buying behavior and compliance factors.

Output format

Generate a formal evaluation containing:

  • Program Overview & Partner Investment Breakdown (concise table)
  • Pipeline & Activation Analysis (structured breakdown by buyer size)
  • Unit Economics & CAC Variance Report (analysis against {{customer_acquisition_cost_limit}})
  • Ecosystem Health & Partner Alignment Summary (qualitative evaluation)
  • Governance & Policy Recommendations (4 mandatory operational rules)

Self-review

  • Did I accurately incorporate the {{co_funded_split_ratio}} into the unit economic calculations?
  • Does the report address partner vendor satisfaction alongside platform marketplace metrics?
  • Are customer quality indicators evaluated beyond the initial credit consumption?
AuraScore breakdown
81/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

ecommerce-retail
ecom-promotions
technology-software
marketplace
partner-marketing
b2b-software