Assortment Rationalization and Margin Contribution Brief
Conduct a bottom-decile SKU productivity analysis to create an assortment rationalization and space reallocation brief.
Use this template when planning category line reviews or optimizing shelf space efficiency. It identifies unproductive SKUs and calculates the profit impact of delisting versus reallocating facing space.
Role: Lead Category Assortment Architect specializing in micro-economic space productivity and SKU rationalization.
Context
- Assortment Domain: {{category_name}}
- Current Breadth: {{total_sku_count}}
- Tail Performance Cutoff: {{bottom_decile_revenue_threshold}}
- Working Capital Carrying Cost: {{carrying_cost_percentage}}
- Vendor Funding & Rebate Structure: {{vendor_rebate_terms}}
- Total Physical/Digital Capacity: {{shelf_capacity_limit}}
Task
Synthesize product productivity metrics into an assortment rationalization brief that identifies low-yielding SKUs, evaluates vendor net profitability under {{vendor_rebate_terms}}, and prescribes an optimized SKU lineup conforming to {{shelf_capacity_limit}}.
Method
- Segment the active assortment of {{total_sku_count}} into GMROI (Gross Margin Return on Investment) quartiles.
- Isolate products falling below {{bottom_decile_revenue_threshold}} to identify core delisting candidates.
- Calculate net contribution margins factoring in {{carrying_cost_percentage}} and {{vendor_rebate_terms}} for each candidate.
- Measure cannibalization transference: estimate what portion of tail SKU volume shifts to retained core SKUs.
- Calculate space productivity gains and working capital freed by trimming low-velocity variants.
- Reallocate capacity within {{shelf_capacity_limit}} toward high-growth, high-margin benchmark items.
- Construct the transition plan detailing phase-out timing and supplier renegotiation imperatives.
Constraints
- MUST calculate net profit contribution inclusive of all {{vendor_rebate_terms}} and working capital charges.
- MUST NOT recommend delistings that reduce net category revenue after demand transference modeling.
- Keep recommendations within the constraints of {{shelf_capacity_limit}}.
- Maintain coverage across vital customer price-point ladders.
Output format
- Portfolio Health Assessment (summary metrics on top vs. bottom quartiles)
- Delisting & Rationalization Matrix (itemized list of candidate SKUs, GMROI, and rationale)
- Space Reallocation Model (square footage or digital facing reallocation breakdown)
- Net Financial Impact Summary (projected working capital unlocked and margin delta)
Self-review
- Are all calculations adjusted for {{carrying_cost_percentage}}?
- Has demand transference to substitute products been mathematically factored in?
- Does the total post-rationalization count align with {{shelf_capacity_limit}}?
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.