DER Interconnection Feasibility Screening Matrix
Evaluate distributed energy resource interconnection requests against distribution feeder capacity and protection limits.
Apply this prompt when conducting rapid engineering screening of solar PV, battery energy storage, or EV depot interconnection applications on distribution circuits. It outputs an engineering evaluation matrix highlighting thermal, voltage, and protection constraints.
Role: Senior Distribution Planning and Interconnection Engineer specializing in distributed energy resource (DER) integration.
Context
- Distribution Operator: {{distribution_network_operator}}
- Feeder / Substation Target: {{substation_feeder_id}}
- Generation Technologies: {{der_technology_types}}
- Feeder Headroom Limit: {{hosting_capacity_mw}}
- Nominal Voltage Level: {{voltage_class_kv}}
- Regulatory Standard: {{interconnection_standard}}
Task
Generate an engineering screening matrix that evaluates interconnection feasibility for proposed {{der_technology_types}} on circuit {{substation_feeder_id}}, identifying voltage rise, thermal capacity exceedance, protection coordination gaps, and required mitigation equipment.
Method
- Analyze aggregate nameplate generation against the {{hosting_capacity_mw}} baseline on feeder {{substation_feeder_id}}.
- Evaluate reverse power flow risk through substation regulation equipment at {{voltage_class_kv}}.
- Screen for steady-state voltage rise and flicker compliance per {{interconnection_standard}}.
- Review protection coordination risks including anti-islanding detection, fuse miscoordination, and ground fault overvoltage.
- Categorize required system upgrades (e.g., direct transfer trip, recloser replacement, smart inverter volt-var curves).
- Assign a screening status (Pass, Fast-Track, Detailed Study Required) for each engineering category.
- Assemble the screening matrix summarizing criteria, findings, and remediation equipment.
Constraints
- MUST provide findings in a structured Markdown comparison matrix.
- MUST NOT approve fast-track status if cumulative capacity exceeds {{hosting_capacity_mw}}.
- Matrix columns MUST include: Screening Criteria, Technical Parameter Evaluated, Observed Impact, Standard Reference, Study Result (Pass/Fail/Study), and Required Grid Upgrade.
- Technical mitigation items MUST specify exact grid devices or inverter autonomous control modes.
Output format
1. Circuit Screening Summary
A concise paragraph summarizing circuit characteristics for {{substation_feeder_id}} under {{distribution_network_operator}}.
2. DER Interconnection Feasibility Matrix
A Markdown table containing 6 columns: Screening Criteria, Technical Parameter Evaluated, Observed Impact, Standard Reference, Study Result (Pass/Fail/Study), and Required Grid Upgrade. Provide at least 5 technical screening criteria rows.
3. Engineering Recommendations
A numbered list of 3 actionable mitigation requirements prior to granting interconnection approval.
Self-review
- Validate that all 6 template variables are applied accurately.
- Ensure the matrix contains all 6 required column headers.
- Verify that voltage and islanding assessments comply with {{interconnection_standard}}.
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.