Apple & iOS
AuraScore 79/100

Apple App Store Medical Review Readiness Assessment

Audit software as a medical device (SaMD) iOS builds for Apple Review Guideline compliance.

Use this template prior to submitting a medical, diagnostic, or patient-facing iOS app to the App Store. It produces a pre-submission clearance report addressing App Store Review Guidelines 1.4, 5.1, and medical disclaimers.

Template

Role: Apple Health Ecosystem Compliance Lead and Release Management Consultant

Context

  • Medical App Name: {{software_medical_device_name}}
  • Stated Clinical Indication: {{intended_use_statement}}
  • Regulatory Clearance Status: {{fda_clearance_status}}
  • Diagnostic Logic / AI Mechanism: {{diagnostic_algorithm_type}}
  • App Privacy Declarations: {{privacy_nutrition_labels}}

Task

Produce an App Store review readiness report evaluating {{software_medical_device_name}} against Apple App Review Guidelines (specifically Safety 1.4.1–1.4.5, Legal 5.1, and Hardware/Sensors 2.5).

Method

  1. Review {{intended_use_statement}} against Apple Guideline 1.4.1 regarding medical claims and disclaimers.
  2. Cross-examine {{fda_clearance_status}} documentation requirements for regional distribution eligibility.
  3. Analyze whether {{diagnostic_algorithm_type}} requires clinical citation links or emergency escalation prompts.
  4. Validate accuracy of {{privacy_nutrition_labels}} against actual binary network calls and SDK dependencies.
  5. Inspect usage of camera, microphone, or external sensor APIs to ensure compliance with medical diagnostic constraints.
  6. Evaluate the App Store product page metadata, screenshots, and copy for forbidden curative assertions.
  7. Generate a comprehensive submission checklist with mitigation strategies for probable App Review inquiries.

Constraints

  • MUST cite specific sub-clauses of the Apple App Store Review Guidelines.
  • MUST NOT approve submissions lacking emergency contact disclaimers for self-triage features.
  • Include explicit guidance on preparing the "App Review Notes" and demo account credentials.
  • Ensure all diagnostic boundaries for {{diagnostic_algorithm_type}} are explicitly documented.

Output format

Provide a structured review report containing:

  1. Submission Clearance Summary (Status: High / Medium / Low Risk of Rejection)
  2. Guideline-by-Guideline Compliance Matrix (Clauses 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 5.1.1, and 5.1.2)
  3. Metadata and Disclaimer Review (verbatim recommendations for store listing and in-app alerts)
  4. App Reviewer Demo Protocol (step-by-step testing instructions to attach in App Store Connect)

Self-review

  • Confirm that {{fda_clearance_status}} is properly reflected in the reviewer notes strategy.
  • Verify that privacy nutrition labels align with third-party analytical SDKs.
  • Ensure disclaimer wording explicitly distinguishes informational advice from emergency care.
AuraScore breakdown
79/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering8/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency7/10 · Adequate

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

developers
developers-apple
healthcare-life-sciences
app-store
compliance
samd