App stores
AuraScore 79/100

Public Sector Mobile Privacy Label and Store Submission Audit

Audit public sector mobile app privacy labels, SDK disclosures, and store metadata prior to release.

Use this template when preparing a public sector or humanitarian mobile app for Apple App Store and Google Play reviews. It guarantees strict alignment with data protection regulations and app store privacy manifests.

Template

Role: Principal Mobile Release Engineer and Public Sector Privacy Compliance Specialist

Context

  • Entity: {{nonprofit_name}}
  • Primary App Function: {{app_purpose}}
  • Release Channels: {{target_app_stores}}
  • Captured User Telemetry: {{sensitive_data_types}}
  • Embedded Integrations: {{third_party_sdks}}
  • Regulatory and Donor Standards: {{grant_compliance_framework}}

Task

Generate an exhaustive, gatekeeper-ready app store submission checklist that evaluates privacy manifests, third-party tracking, and store metadata to prevent submission rejections and ensure compliance with public sector data mandates for {{nonprofit_name}}.

Method

  1. Map every data point in {{sensitive_data_types}} to Apple Privacy Nutrition Labels and Google Play Data Safety declaration categories.
  2. Cross-examine all embedded libraries in {{third_party_sdks}} against declared app store tracking declarations and network security configs.
  3. Validate that {{app_purpose}} workflows handle sensitive civic or beneficiary records without undeclared background data transmission.
  4. Audit consent collection flows against the mandates of {{grant_compliance_framework}} and target app store parental/vulnerable group policies.
  5. Draft verification items for public sector account verification, ensuring organizational domain alignment across {{target_app_stores}}.
  6. Formulate binary pass/fail validation criteria for account deletion, telemetry opt-outs, and offline data hygiene.
  7. Detail store metadata inspection checks, including screenshot content, age rating questionnaire consistency, and support URL validity.
  8. Establish post-submission rejection recovery protocols tailored to civic utility and nonprofit developer accounts.

Constraints

  • Every checklist item MUST include a verifiable technical artifact, responsible owner, and pass/fail criterion.
  • MUST NOT permit ambiguous self-attestations without corresponding codebase or SDK manifest proof.
  • Checklists must cover both Apple App Store and Google Play developer policy specificities.
  • Prohibit unencrypted data transit or undeclared SDK analytics across all line items.

Output format

  • Phase 1: Store Account and Verification Prerequisites (5-7 checklist items)
  • Phase 2: Data Safety & Privacy Manifest Matrix (6-8 checklist items)
  • Phase 3: SDK and Third-Party Binary Audit (5-7 checklist items)
  • Phase 4: Metadata, Age Ratings, and Regulatory Disclosures (5-7 checklist items)
  • Phase 5: Pre-Flight Rejection Risk Mitigation (4-6 checklist items)
  • Sign-off Block: Formal submission readiness confirmation block

Self-review

  • Confirm all 6 context variables (e.g., {{grant_compliance_framework}}, {{sensitive_data_types}}) are explicitly referenced in audit checks.
  • Ensure each section contains distinct, actionable items rather than high-level policy summaries.
  • Verify that pass/fail thresholds precisely reflect developer store submission requirements.
AuraScore breakdown
79/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering10/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

developers
developers-app-stores
public-sector-nonprofit
app-stores
compliance
mobile-privacy