Public Sector Mobile Privacy Label and Store Submission Audit
Audit public sector mobile app privacy labels, SDK disclosures, and store metadata prior to release.
Use this template when preparing a public sector or humanitarian mobile app for Apple App Store and Google Play reviews. It guarantees strict alignment with data protection regulations and app store privacy manifests.
Role: Principal Mobile Release Engineer and Public Sector Privacy Compliance Specialist
Context
- Entity: {{nonprofit_name}}
- Primary App Function: {{app_purpose}}
- Release Channels: {{target_app_stores}}
- Captured User Telemetry: {{sensitive_data_types}}
- Embedded Integrations: {{third_party_sdks}}
- Regulatory and Donor Standards: {{grant_compliance_framework}}
Task
Generate an exhaustive, gatekeeper-ready app store submission checklist that evaluates privacy manifests, third-party tracking, and store metadata to prevent submission rejections and ensure compliance with public sector data mandates for {{nonprofit_name}}.
Method
- Map every data point in {{sensitive_data_types}} to Apple Privacy Nutrition Labels and Google Play Data Safety declaration categories.
- Cross-examine all embedded libraries in {{third_party_sdks}} against declared app store tracking declarations and network security configs.
- Validate that {{app_purpose}} workflows handle sensitive civic or beneficiary records without undeclared background data transmission.
- Audit consent collection flows against the mandates of {{grant_compliance_framework}} and target app store parental/vulnerable group policies.
- Draft verification items for public sector account verification, ensuring organizational domain alignment across {{target_app_stores}}.
- Formulate binary pass/fail validation criteria for account deletion, telemetry opt-outs, and offline data hygiene.
- Detail store metadata inspection checks, including screenshot content, age rating questionnaire consistency, and support URL validity.
- Establish post-submission rejection recovery protocols tailored to civic utility and nonprofit developer accounts.
Constraints
- Every checklist item MUST include a verifiable technical artifact, responsible owner, and pass/fail criterion.
- MUST NOT permit ambiguous self-attestations without corresponding codebase or SDK manifest proof.
- Checklists must cover both Apple App Store and Google Play developer policy specificities.
- Prohibit unencrypted data transit or undeclared SDK analytics across all line items.
Output format
- Phase 1: Store Account and Verification Prerequisites (5-7 checklist items)
- Phase 2: Data Safety & Privacy Manifest Matrix (6-8 checklist items)
- Phase 3: SDK and Third-Party Binary Audit (5-7 checklist items)
- Phase 4: Metadata, Age Ratings, and Regulatory Disclosures (5-7 checklist items)
- Phase 5: Pre-Flight Rejection Risk Mitigation (4-6 checklist items)
- Sign-off Block: Formal submission readiness confirmation block
Self-review
- Confirm all 6 context variables (e.g., {{grant_compliance_framework}}, {{sensitive_data_types}}) are explicitly referenced in audit checks.
- Ensure each section contains distinct, actionable items rather than high-level policy summaries.
- Verify that pass/fail thresholds precisely reflect developer store submission requirements.
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.