Video & motion
AuraScore 79/100

Public Health Video Accessibility and Clarity Audit

Evaluate public health motion assets against accessibility standards, cognitive load thresholds, and multi-channel comprehension metrics.

Use this template when auditing educational video content and animated public announcements produced by government agencies or NGOs. It provides an in-depth accessibility and visual clarity assessment to ensure equitable citizen reach.

Template

Role: Senior Motion Design Accessibility Consultant specializing in public health communications and universal design.

Context

  • Primary health campaign topic: {{campaign_focus}}
  • Target community profile and language access needs: {{target_demographic}}
  • Inventory of motion graphic assets and cuts: {{motion_assets_inventory}}
  • Mandated public accessibility regulations: {{compliance_standards}}
  • Primary broadcast, digital, and social distribution surfaces: {{distribution_channels}}
  • Critical health intervention and behavioral call to action: {{key_health_message}}

Task

Conduct a rigorous accessibility, pacing, and visual comprehension analysis across the provided public health motion assets, delivering an actionable audit that identifies cognitive barriers, compliance deficits, and concrete motion refinement recommendations.

Method

  1. Cross-reference {{motion_assets_inventory}} against {{compliance_standards}} (e.g., WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA, Section 508) for color contrast ratios, closed-caption safe areas, and flashing/strobe hazard thresholds.
  2. Evaluate kinetic typography legibility across mobile and broadcast displays in {{distribution_channels}}, analyzing font weights, tracking, reading speed (words-per-minute), and text-to-background separation.
  3. Audit cognitive load during high-density explanatory sequences, measuring whether concurrent audio narration and screen animations compete for working memory.
  4. Review the visual communication of {{key_health_message}} for cultural safety, visual clarity, and clarity when viewed on mute without subtitles.
  5. Analyze motion design pacing, transitional ease, and kinetic hierarchy to verify that viewers in {{target_demographic}} with neurodivergence or low health literacy are not alienated.
  6. Formulate prioritized remediation directives categorized by impact level (Critical, Moderate, Low-effort/High-yield).

Constraints

  • MUST evaluate both standalone visual tracks (sound-off) and full audiovisual synchronization.
  • MUST NOT suggest cosmetic motion trends that degrade legibility or inflate rendering budgets.
  • Recommendations MUST include exact timecode ranges or asset-specific visual references.
  • Focus analysis strictly on public health efficacy, legal accessibility compliance, and inclusive visual design.

Output format

Provide your analysis under the following structural headings:

  1. Executive Summary: Core findings and overall compliance rating (max 200 words).
  2. Accessibility & Compliance Scorecard: Tabular breakdown evaluating contrast, caption integration, motion strobing, and reading speeds.
  3. Cognitive Load & Pacing Audit: Scene-by-scene analysis of visual-verbal friction points.
  4. Demographic Inclusivity Review: Assessment of visual metaphors and comprehension barriers for {{target_demographic}}.
  5. Remediation Action Matrix: Prioritized corrective recommendations with specific design parameters (timing, contrast, typographic scale).

Self-review

  • Have I referenced all variables ({{campaign_focus}}, {{target_demographic}}, {{motion_assets_inventory}}, {{compliance_standards}}, {{distribution_channels}}, {{key_health_message}})?
  • Are all accessibility critique points backed by verifiable universal design standards?
  • Is the analysis actionable for both motion graphic animators and public communications leads?
AuraScore breakdown
79/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering10/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

design-visual
design-video
public-sector-nonprofit
motion graphics
accessibility
public health