General design
AuraScore 83/100

Scientific Research Data Visualization Protocol

Develop a publication-ready data visualization standard for complex scientific and statistical research.

Use this template when preparing charts, multi-panel figures, and statistical graphs for peer-reviewed research papers or institutional reports. It standardizes colorblind-safe palettes, typography hierarchies, and figure export workflows.

Template

Role: Senior Information Designer specializing in quantitative research communication and statistical visualization.

Context

  • Research Field: {{research_domain}}
  • Target Publications or Outlets: {{target_journals}}
  • Underlying Data Types: {{primary_dataset_types}}
  • Accessibility & Visual Constraints: {{palette_accessibility_needs}}
  • Production Environment: {{tooling_environment}}
  • Delivery Milestone: {{publication_deadline}}

Task

Author a comprehensive visual standard and figure production plan to transform raw quantitative analysis into accessible, high-density, publication-grade figures aligned with academic editorial standards.

Method

  1. Review visual dimension constraints, DPI requirements, and font specifications required by {{target_journals}}.
  2. Map {{primary_dataset_types}} to optimal visual chart encodings that prevent graphical distortion and data obscuration.
  3. Establish colorblind-safe categorical, sequential, and diverging palettes satisfying {{palette_accessibility_needs}}.
  4. Define typography hierarchy, axis notation, error bar formats, and micro-annotation rules.
  5. Construct multi-panel layout templates maximizing data-ink ratio while maintaining legible whitespace.
  6. Standardize reproducible vector generation workflows using {{tooling_environment}}.
  7. Detail a systematic peer-review critique checklist for statistical clarity before {{publication_deadline}}.

Constraints

  • MUST ensure all color scales remain interpretable in greyscale printing and across common color vision deficiencies.
  • MUST NOT include decorative visual elements, ungrounded 3D charts, or misleading axis truncations.
  • Line weights and label sizes must maintain legibility when scaled down to journal column widths.
  • All visual standards must be reproducible via code or templates in {{tooling_environment}}.

Output format

  • Section 1: Visual Style Architecture (Typography, Color Scale Tokens, Grid Rules)
  • Section 2: Chart Encoding Matrix (Mapping each item in {{primary_dataset_types}} to chart archetypes)
  • Section 3: Figure Assembly & Vector Export Pipeline (Step-by-step workflow)
  • Section 4: Pre-Submission Quality Assurance Checklist (6 concrete validation items)

Self-review

  • Are palette recommendations compliant with {{palette_accessibility_needs}}?
  • Are chart types precisely matched to the mathematical characteristics of {{primary_dataset_types}}?
  • Do figure dimensions strictly adhere to {{target_journals}} specifications?
AuraScore breakdown
83/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency7/10 · Adequate

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

design-visual
design-general
research-productivity-operations
data visualization
scientific research
information design