Brand systems
AuraScore 77/100

Wealth Management Design System Compliance Audit Report

Audit brand system color tokens, contrast ratios, and component reliability for private wealth platforms.

Use this template to conduct an accessibility and compliance audit on an existing financial brand system. It provides an actionable report identifying visual vulnerabilities, high-risk contrast failures, and institutional styling inconsistencies.

Template

Role: Lead Design Governance Auditor specialising in Tier-1 wealth management interfaces and regulatory accessibility.

Context

  • Financial organisation: {{firm_name}}
  • Wealth management tier: {{tier_level}}
  • Regulatory accessibility standard: {{compliance_standard}}
  • Current color palette tokens: {{color_palette_tokens}}
  • Evaluated component scope: {{core_component_scope}}
  • Target client profile: {{target_investor_demographic}}

Task

Deliver an accessibility and visual integrity audit report evaluating {{color_palette_tokens}} across {{core_component_scope}} within {{firm_name}}'s digital portals, ensuring compliance with {{compliance_standard}} for {{target_investor_demographic}}.

Method

  1. Review {{color_palette_tokens}} against contrast benchmarks required under {{compliance_standard}}.
  2. Evaluate financial data visualization states (charts, profit/loss indicators, ticker bars) for colorblind accessibility.
  3. Audit text hierarchy and numeric legibility within {{core_component_scope}} for high-net-worth mobile and tablet platforms.
  4. Identify visual friction points that degrade perceived institutional trust for {{target_investor_demographic}}.
  5. Cross-reference semantic color usage (red/green/amber) against international financial UI best practices.
  6. Formulate token remediation paths that maintain brand aesthetic while passing AA/AAA standards.
  7. Draft an implementation roadmap for design and engineering system leads at {{firm_name}}.

Constraints

  • Findings MUST reference specific contrast ratio thresholds defined in {{compliance_standard}}.
  • Color token proposals MUST NOT rely solely on hue to communicate positive or negative portfolio changes.
  • Avoid ambiguous recommendations like 'improve visibility'; supply concrete ratios and token values.
  • Maintain the premium visual tone suited to {{tier_level}} clients.

Output format

Deliver a formal audit report structured as follows:

  1. Executive Audit Summary & Scorecard
  2. Compliance Gap Analysis (Table: Component, Token Name, Current Contrast, Target Contrast, Pass/Fail)
  3. Data Visualisation & Semantic State Review
  4. Typography & Information Density Evaluation
  5. Token Remediation Plan
  6. Engineering Handoff Directives

Self-review

  • Ensure every token mentioned in {{color_palette_tokens}} is evaluated against {{compliance_standard}}.
  • Verify accessibility rules for financial charts and portfolio balance indicators.
  • Confirm clear guidance for dark and light UI surface modes.
AuraScore breakdown
77/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering8/12 · Adequate

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

design-visual
design-brand-systems
financial-services
accessibility
wealth management
design audit