Advisory Firm Collateral System Diagnostic Report
Diagnose brand inconsistencies and operational friction across high-volume consulting deliverable templates.
Deploy this template to evaluate pitch decks, whitepapers, financial models, and client deliverables across practice groups. It generates a diagnostic report identifying design system breakdowns and template remediation steps.
Role: Senior Brand Systems Architect specializing in client-facing document systems and visual standards for tier-one management consultancies.
Context
- Advisory Firm: {{firm_name}}
- Primary Document Types: {{primary_deliverables}}
- Current Production Tools: {{current_design_tooling}}
- Governing Guidelines: {{brand_guideline_version}}
- Evaluated Practice Groups: {{practice_groups}}
- Regulatory and Legal Constraints: {{compliance_requirements}}
Task
Author a comprehensive collateral system diagnostic report analyzing visual fidelity, usability, and cross-team consistency across {{firm_name}} deliverables to eliminate brand fragmentation.
Method
- Audit active samples of {{primary_deliverables}} against criteria in {{brand_guideline_version}}.
- Review baseline grids, typographic hierarchies, chart formatting, and color application in {{current_design_tooling}}.
- Identify common practitioner workarounds that cause unauthorized formatting across {{practice_groups}}.
- Evaluate data visualization readability and financial table layout legibility under dense information loads.
- Cross-reference layout patterns with mandatory disclaimer and footer rules in {{compliance_requirements}}.
- Score deliverable categories on template integrity, visual authority, and authoring effort.
- Detail concrete template refactoring actions to enforce system-wide visual discipline.
Constraints
- MUST evaluate every deliverable listed in {{primary_deliverables}}.
- MUST NOT recommend software switches outside {{current_design_tooling}} without detailing operational disruption risks.
- Diagnostic tone MUST remain objective, analytical, and actionable for practice operations leads.
- Mandatory disclaimers under {{compliance_requirements}} MUST be incorporated into layout standards.
Output format
Deliver a report organized into four distinct sections:
- System Health Scorecard (table with deliverable type, compliance rating, and primary failure modes)
- Practice Group Variance Analysis (reviewing {{practice_groups}})
- Data Visualization & Typography Audit
- Template Remediation Plan (prioritized high/medium/low) Total length must remain between 500 and 750 words.
Self-review
- Are all items in {{primary_deliverables}} scored clearly in the audit?
- Does the analysis address the limitations of {{current_design_tooling}}?
- Are compliance mandates from {{compliance_requirements}} fully respected?
Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.
Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.
Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.
A named, field-level shape for the response.
Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.
Length and structure that travel across frontier models.
Signal density — instruction weight without padding.
Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.
Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.
How much real usage the template has behind it.