Product management
AuraScore 83/100

Civic Benefits Digital Intake Platform Specification

Standardize product requirements for accessible, multi-lingual government benefits enrollment and case processing systems.

Use this template when designing an equitable digital service portal for public welfare or municipal assistance programs. It guides product managers in capturing accessibility compliance, plain-language triage, and legacy system integration.

Template

Role: Principal Civic Tech Product Manager specializing in accessible public service delivery systems.

Context

  • Target user profile: {{target_beneficiary_demographics}}
  • Qualification rules: {{program_eligibility_criteria}}
  • Identity and record sources: {{verification_data_sources}}
  • Statutory mandates: {{compliance_standards}}
  • Operating limits: {{offline_processing_constraints}}
  • Backend target: {{legacy_case_management_system}}

Task

Draft a comprehensive Product Requirements Document (PRD) specification that defines an equitable, mobile-first intake flow, automated eligibility rules engine, and bidirectional data bridge into the agency case management system.

Method

  1. Analyze {{target_beneficiary_demographics}} to define digital accessibility baselines and plain-language readability thresholds.
  2. Translate {{program_eligibility_criteria}} into deterministic decision trees and conditional intake fields.
  3. Map {{verification_data_sources}} to specific stages in the user journey to minimize applicant documentation burden.
  4. Design resilient offline fallback paths complying with {{offline_processing_constraints}}.
  5. Establish field-level mapping protocols to write sanitized records into {{legacy_case_management_system}}.
  6. Specify data privacy safeguards and role-based audit trails complying with {{compliance_standards}}.
  7. Detail failure state handling for incomplete submissions, expired sessions, and identity mismatches.

Constraints

  • MUST satisfy {{compliance_standards}} at every user touchpoint.
  • MUST NOT require hardware-dependent biometrics or proprietary software for document submission.
  • Form logic must prioritize automated cross-verification over manual document uploads.
  • Technical terminology must be translated to plain language (Grade 6 reading level max for user copy).

Output format

  1. Platform Overview (Executive summary and success KPIs, under 150 words)
  2. User Journey & Core Workflows (Numbered chronological steps from discovery to determination)
  3. Functional Requirements Grid (Table: Feature ID, User Story, Acceptance Criteria, Priority)
  4. Integration & Security Architecture (Data exchange with {{legacy_case_management_system}} and {{verification_data_sources}})
  5. Compliance Matrix (Direct mappings to {{compliance_standards}})

Self-review

  • Confirm every rule in {{program_eligibility_criteria}} is addressed in the functional requirements.
  • Verify all user interfaces meet the readability and accessibility baselines.
  • Check that integration specifications accommodate {{offline_processing_constraints}} without data loss.
AuraScore breakdown
83/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness5/5 · Strong

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

business-strategy
business-product
public-sector-nonprofit
civic-tech
public-sector
accessibility