Evaluation
AuraScore 81/100

Causal Inference and Multi-Step Strategy Agent Evaluation Matrix

Score strategic autonomous agents on counterfactual analysis, decision tree validity, and compounding error risk.

Implement this matrix when auditing complex planning and strategic reasoning agents. It stress-tests multi-stage causal graph construction, downstream impact estimation, and counterfactual reasoning under uncertainty.

Template

Role: Lead AI Decision Scientist and Causal Systems Evaluation Architect.

Context

  • Strategic decision agent: {{strategic_agent_id}}
  • Target analytical scenario: {{scenario_complexity_profile}}
  • Causal graph ground truth: {{reference_causal_graph}}
  • Decision horizon length: {{planning_horizon_steps}}
  • Risk tolerance factor: {{risk_tolerance_factor}}
  • Uncertainty simulation dataset: {{stochastic_test_suite}}

Task

Develop an analytical evaluation matrix to grade {{strategic_agent_id}} on its causal inference fidelity, counterfactual validity, and strategic planning robustness when applied to {{scenario_complexity_profile}} using {{stochastic_test_suite}} over {{planning_horizon_steps}}.

Method

  1. Map agent-inferred cause-and-effect paths against the verified structural relationships in {{reference_causal_graph}}.
  2. Quantify edge insertion, deletion, and directionality errors in the agent's internal causal models.
  3. Subject the agent's multi-step action proposals to the stochastic conditions in {{stochastic_test_suite}}.
  4. Evaluate counterfactual simulation quality by testing how accurately the agent predicts intervention outcomes.
  5. Track error compounding and state divergence across each step of {{planning_horizon_steps}}.
  6. Evaluate policy conservatism and resource allocation decisions relative to {{risk_tolerance_factor}}.
  7. Populate a multi-axis strategic performance matrix contrasting expected versus realized outcomes.
  8. Formulate definitive boundaries for autonomous decision authority based on causal validity scores.

Constraints

  • MUST calculate error compounding explicitly across all steps up to {{planning_horizon_steps}}.
  • MUST NOT accept correlational proxy reasoning as valid causal link validation.
  • Matrix columns must separate deterministic mechanics from probabilistic projections.
  • Causal edge validity must be scored against {{reference_causal_graph}} with explicit precision and recall.

Output format

  • Strategic Evaluation Matrix (Markdown table with columns: Stage Step, Causal Edge Precision %, Counterfactual Accuracy %, Compounding Drift %, Risk Policy Compliance, Overall Step Score)
  • Causal Model Diagnostic Summary (Table comparing Inferred Graph vs Reference Graph edges)
  • Strategic Failure Surface (Bulleted analysis of 3 vulnerable branching points)
  • Operational Autonomy Boundaries (Explicit numerical thresholds for deployment)

Self-review

  • Ensure every causal edge discrepancy is mapped to a specific node in {{reference_causal_graph}}.
  • Confirm drift percentages mathematically compound across {{planning_horizon_steps}}.
  • Validate that risk policy compliance aligns precisely with {{risk_tolerance_factor}}.
AuraScore breakdown
81/100Provisional
Instruction clarity15/15 · Strong

Explicit role, a named task, and discrete steps the model can follow.

Context architecture12/12 · Strong

Background, inputs and variables the model needs before it starts.

Constraint engineering12/12 · Strong

Hard boundaries — what the model must and must not do.

Output specification6/14 · Thin

A named, field-level shape for the response.

Reasoning structure10/10 · Strong

Ordered work items that force analysis before an answer.

Model compatibility10/10 · Strong

Length and structure that travel across frontier models.

Token efficiency5/10 · Thin

Signal density — instruction weight without padding.

Reusability7/7 · Strong

Documented variables so the scaffold adapts to new inputs.

Robustness3/5 · Adequate

Quality bar, assumptions and behaviour when inputs are thin.

Observed performance1/5 · Thin

How much real usage the template has behind it.

ai-agents
agents-evaluation
complex-reasoning-analysis-math
causal-inference
strategic-planning
decision-evaluation